Teams

JMu (Park Road)

2025 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-14vs JSlep (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Martha Nazemi vs Jane Johnsen / Kate Blankenship0-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs APhillips/CTerry (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHilda Austin / Mary McGarvey vs Alix Pavlic Phillips / Delane Lovelace6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoyce Mu / Gayle Gold vs Elizabeth Hollidge / Karen Sterrett6-1
2025-04-02vs MFigard (Matthews)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Duganier / Gayle Gold vs Lu Ann Burke / Rosa Szalanski0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Nazemi / Linda Burks-Adams vs Ann Richards / Margaret MacKie1-6, 2-6
2025-03-29vs SStover (Southampton)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Mary McGarvey vs Patrice Forbes / Lisa O'Shea3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Martha Nazemi vs Susan Stover / Janice Daniel0-6, 0-6
2025-03-18vs SDickson (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary McGarvey / Karen Duganier vs Michele Kelly / Sandy Johnson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Tobin / Linda Burks-Adams vs Celia Stallings / Kathi Todd6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-10vs JHadley/JNomina (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Burks-Adams / Gayle Gold vs Tina Hough / Susan Castle0-6, 2-6
2025-03-03vs SMyers (Park Road)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Duganier / Gayle Gold vs Joeline Ohlhaut / Sandy Myers6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary McGarvey / Linda Burks-Adams vs Susan Grills / Sheryl Smith6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Hilda Austin
published
2.87
Mary McGarvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Joyce Mu
published
2.78
Gayle Gold
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Linda Burks-Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.16
Maryann Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patti Tobin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilda Austin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Mary McGarvey
73W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Joyce Mu
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Gayle Gold
37W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Linda Burks-Adams
41W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Maryann Whalen
25W–113L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16
Patti Tobin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.