Teams

Watts//Piedmont 18 2.5W Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Meredith Lantz6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Susan Barnes6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNakisha Boulware Watts vs Janice Wuebker1-6, 0-6
2025-07-24vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesNoelle Budzyn vs Diana Angeles3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Kopp vs Erin Wallace0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Meredith Vaughn6-2, 6-0
2025-07-03vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Clara Gonzalez Flores1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Erin Wallace7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNakisha Boulware Watts vs Diana Angeles0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNoelle Budzyn vs Michelle Shumate6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Kopp vs Lyndsey Grubb6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Janice Wuebker6-0, 6-0
2025-06-12vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesJessica Kopp vs Clara Gonzalez Flores1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Diana Angeles0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNoelle Budzyn vs Meredith Lantz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Michelle Shumate6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJessica Kopp vs Janice Wuebker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-22vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Meredith Vaughn6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNoelle Budzyn vs Allison Chisholm6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNakisha Boulware Watts vs Allyson Wood1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Sydney Wittman
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.68
Jenifer Checo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.18
Caroline Jackson
published 2.5
Jessica Kopp
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Nakisha Boulware Watts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Noelle Budzyn
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Wittman
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Jenifer Checo
32W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.68
2.5
Caroline Jackson
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jessica Kopp
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nakisha Boulware Watts
0W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noelle Budzyn
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.