Teams

Cochran/Scott/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-28vs Mitchell/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Pratt / Elisa Romans vs Rainey Mitchell / Amy May4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLacey Fuson vs Jourdan Hurd1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Elizabeth Prater vs Carly Bethel / Angie Simmons1-6, 2-6
2026-04-21vs Benson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLayla Cochran / Patty Lohmeyer vs Allison Bassler / Lauren Lafevers-flatt1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Pratt vs Andrea Sanders4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Scott / Lee Patnaik vs Kelly Benson / Ashley Hinesley4-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs Osborne/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatty Lohmeyer / Hannah Scott vs Brooke Prince / Leslie DiNella6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Prater vs Anne Smith6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElisa Romans / Leslie Jackson vs Claudia Levy / Carol Artoul6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-31vs Simpson/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesElisa Romans / Patty Lohmeyer vs Tara McGuire / Janis Martinello6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Medlin vs Tia Aryal0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Elizabeth Prater vs Sarah Manners / Kelly Daly6-4, 6-1
2026-03-24vs Mitchell/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah Scott / Lee Patnaik vs Rainey Mitchell / Lindsey Burroughs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristin Pratt vs Jourdan Hurd0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLayla Cochran / Lacey Fuson vs Amy May / Courtney Mclarty6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs Benson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLayla Cochran / Hannah Scott vs Lauren Lafevers-flatt / Allison Bassler2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLacey Fuson vs Andrea Sanders2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLee Patnaik / Kristin Pratt vs Kelly Benson / Kristi Heath2-6, 3-6
2026-03-17vs Boswell/Schoeplein/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna West / Patty Lohmeyer vs Krissie Self / Andrea Boswell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Prater vs Andrea Jones2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Elisa Romans vs Elizabeth Russell / Lauren Johnson6-1, 6-1
2026-03-03vs Goodsell/Glover/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLee Patnaik / Patty Lohmeyer vs Analise Glover / Sheri Kelly6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Prater vs Kristen Kerestes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLayla Cochran / Hannah Scott vs Beth Ann Brown / Martha Fox6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Patty Lohmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Lacey Fuson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Elisa Romans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Anna West
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.36
Lee Patnaik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Lindsay LeBreton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Layla Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Hannah Scott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.13
Katie Medlin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.10
Elizabeth Prater
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
1.88
Kristin Pratt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Lohmeyer + Anna West2351% games+8.5% vs expected
Layla Cochran + Hannah Scott3443% games−4.7% vs expected
Lee Patnaik + Patty Lohmeyer224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Patnaik + Anna West134 matchesnot enough data
Patty Lohmeyer + Hannah Scott314 matchesnot enough data
Lee Patnaik + Hannah Scott123 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Fuson + Patty Lohmeyer213 matchesnot enough data
Layla Cochran + Patty Lohmeyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Lohmeyer
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Lacey Fuson
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Elisa Romans
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Anna West
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Lee Patnaik
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Lindsay LeBreton
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Layla Cochran
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Hannah Scott
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Katie Medlin
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Elizabeth Prater
8W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kristin Pratt
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.