Teams

LOTA/Shannon Taylor

2026 LOTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Women - Spring · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-15vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Lovely / Yvette van der Wiel vs Lois Marques / Kimberly Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Rover / Marty Wetherington vs Cheryl Mazza / Catherine Forscht6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Snyder / Katie O'Bryan vs Gail Watkins / Tina Burns6-0, 6-4
2026-04-08vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesBridget Tomasicchio / Angela Rover vs Kimberly Smith / Stefanie Kemp6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen Lemming / Yvette van der Wiel vs Geri Pomerantz / Jeanne Mosakowski6-4, 6-3
2026-03-25vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Snyder / Mary Ratelle vs Nancy Anderson / Kimberly Smith6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesShannon Taylor / Marty Wetherington vs Tina Burns / Cheryl Mazza6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Leppert / Yvette van der Wiel vs Jeannine Flynn / Gail Watkins6-3, 6-1
2026-03-18vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Essex / Shannon Dykes vs Nancy Anderson / Kimberly Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEllen Lemming / Patricia Lovely vs Elizabeth Dagley / Geri Pomerantz1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Leppert / Marty Wetherington vs Catherine Forscht / Cheryl Mazza6-1, 6-4
2026-03-11vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Ratelle / Bridget Tomasicchio vs Lois Marques / Elizabeth Dagley7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Dykes / Laura Essex vs Gail Watkins / Stefanie Kemp6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Rover / Colleen Reynolds vs Tina Burns / Jane Melilli6-1, 6-3
2026-03-04vs LOTA/Jeanne MosakowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesBridget Tomasicchio / Yvette van der Wiel vs Kimberly Smith / Nancy Anderson6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesColleen Reynolds / Shannon Taylor vs Jeannine Flynn / Catherine Forscht6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Lovely / Mary Ratelle vs Jeanne Mosakowski / Tina Burns6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Bridget Tomasicchio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Marty Wetherington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Patricia Lovely
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Angela Rover
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Katie O'Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Yvette van der Wiel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Sarah Leppert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Shannon Dykes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Colleen Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Ellen Lemming
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Mary Ratelle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Laura Essex
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Snyder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Dykes + Laura Essex303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Tomasicchio
82W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Marty Wetherington
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Patricia Lovely
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Angela Rover
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Katie O'Bryan
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Yvette van der Wiel
35W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Sarah Leppert
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Shannon Dykes
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Colleen Reynolds
17W–29L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Ellen Lemming
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Mary Ratelle
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Laura Essex
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Susan Snyder
115W–63L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.