Teams

Brown/Held/18/5.5/CWN/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 2.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-22vs Muscenti/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Marcus vs Melinda Muscenti / Kimberly Hosch2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesValerie Martinez / Megan Snider vs Brittany Graffagnini / Lauren Ponstein6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGiang Smith / Jordan Mathies vs Leigh Riley / Rachel Hagstette6-3, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Darden/Pottharst/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Snider / Sandra Denn vs Rebekah Teesdale / Natalie Pottharst0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Amanda Held vs Lauren Hammond / Emily Bisso1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Wise / Emily Brown vs Susan Fallahi / Jacqueline Carey0-6, 1-6
2025-09-10vs Swan/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth St John / Kristen Misuraca vs Roquel Savoy / Elinor Sanders6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Held / Emily Brown vs Holly Garrity / Meg Couvillon0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Schroeder / Giang Smith vs Jill May / Lisa Wurtzel4-6, 3-6
2025-09-03vs Williamson/18/5.5/NOCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Hellen Cappo vs Robin Williamson / Katherine Duncan1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth St John / Victoria Judge vs Lydia Butler / Amy Jones3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Mathies / Megan Snider vs Melyne Holmes / Anna Riess1-6, 0-6
2025-08-26vs Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Hellen Cappo vs Amy Centola / Kimberly Ellis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCleo Pappas / Giang Smith vs Kelly Phillips / Laura Thomas6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVictoria Judge / Amanda Held vs Rebecca Mercer / Merideth Eldridge6-3, 6-1
2025-08-18vs Keller/Kiefer/18/5.5/CWN/CapsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Held / Connie Wise vs Alison Kiefer / Tracey Duplantis1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJordan Mathies / Kristen Misuraca vs Gwen Keller / Cynthia Cimino6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Denn / Susan Kurtz vs Cynthia Bradford / Neyda Leslie7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Darden/Pottharst/18/5.5/CWN/CP60180161
2PerinoForster/18/5.5/CWN/CP60171265
3Powers/18/5.5/CWN/CP5114413117
4Williamson/18/5.5/NOCC5112613132
5Berniard/18/5.5/CWN/CP3310819146
6Swan/18/5.5/CWN/CP339920143
7Lewis/18/5.5/CWN/XU339920154
8Ackerman/18/5.5/CWN/CP3381023180
9Brown/Held/18/5.5/CWN/CP2471124172
10Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CP1551327183
11Keller/Kiefer/18/5.5/CWN/Caps1551327185
12Muscenti/18/5.5/CWN/CP1521633205
13Potts/18/5.5/CWN/CP0611735215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Cleo Pappas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kelly Marcus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Victoria Judge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Giang Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Connie Wise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.47
Catherine Schroeder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Amanda Held
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Sandra Denn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.24
Valerie Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Elizabeth St John
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.13
Hellen Cappo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Megan Snider
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Mathies
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Misuraca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Misuraca + Kelly Marcus213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Marcus + Victoria Judge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cleo Pappas
5W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Kelly Marcus
17W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Victoria Judge
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Giang Smith
4W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Connie Wise
17W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Catherine Schroeder
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Amanda Held
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.41
Sandra Denn
10W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
Valerie Martinez
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.24
2.5
Elizabeth St John
7W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Hellen Cappo
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Megan Snider
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Jordan Mathies
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Misuraca
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.