Teams

MEasterling18C-HVCC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

14 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
2026-09-07vs SFranks.7.5C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAimee Poduri / Stacey Burkert vs Kelsey Norris / Katie Elder3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Catherine Jefferson vs Lisa Montague / Natalie Naramor4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Lindsay King vs Lydia Youngblood / Laurie Straube6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-09-03vs CHaywood-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Aimee Poduri vs Corinne Haywood / Chace Ogle0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Virkler / Jane Waters vs Kyrsten Le / Jordan Wilkins6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlana Argersinger / Abigail Presson vs Elyssa Millard / Dallas Knight6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-20vs KEvans-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay King / Amanda Lacoff vs Katie Evans / Hillary Mulder4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Jefferson / Abigail Presson vs Amy Hobbs / Erin Wynia7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Howell / Caroline Hamilton vs Deanna Lape / Kyra Webb7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Meredith Howell
published
3.87
Stacey Burkert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Abigail Presson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Amanda Lacoff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Linsey Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Laura Virkler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Lindsay King
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.45
Alana Argersinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Anne Confer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Catherine Jefferson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Caroline Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
3.09
Aimee Poduri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jane Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Susan Easterling + Amanda Lacoff5165% games+11.8% vs expected
Linsey Hughes + Catherine Jefferson9160% games−0.3% vs expected
Stacey Burkert + Amanda Lacoff10752% games−0.4% vs expected
Meredith Howell + Amanda Lacoff4158% games−0.8% vs expected
Linsey Hughes + Stacey Burkert7159% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Jefferson + Stacey Burkert5257% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Presson + Amanda Lacoff2345% gamesnot enough data
Linsey Hughes + Laura Virkler044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Howell
36W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Stacey Burkert
175W–117L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Abigail Presson
8W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Amanda Lacoff
191W–114L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Linsey Hughes
87W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Laura Virkler
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Lindsay King
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Alana Argersinger
35W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Anne Confer
43W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Catherine Jefferson
119W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Caroline Hamilton
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
Mary Susan Easterling
25W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Aimee Poduri
21W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jane Waters
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.