Teams

Bond, Emma

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs Smith, AutumnLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Turner / Amanda Clark vs Lindsey Brunson / Kathrynrose Kidd0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Stanton / Wendy George vs Elizabeth Randall / Elizabeth Derck1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Mitchell Walker / Alex Miller vs Autumn Smith / Audrey Youngblood7-6, 6-1
2026-08-20vs Sykes, JoannaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Fulton / Katherine Byrd vs Tiffany Gore / Kate Feldman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Miller / Jordan Mitchell Walker vs Amy Sherman / Sheila Self4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Clark / Anne Stanton vs Joanna Sykes / Polly Moon4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith, Autumn1021226
2Ramsey, Nikki1021330
3Stewart, Kaiti000000
4Bond, Emma000000
5Webb, Jill000000
6Hodges, Martha000000
7Sykes, Joanna0112535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Emma Bond
published
3.14
Katherine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jordan Mitchell Walker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Janice Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Beverly Turner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.74
Anne Stanton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Shea Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Byrd + Janice Fulton7160% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Bond
33W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Katherine Byrd
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Jordan Mitchell Walker
30W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Janice Fulton
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
3.5
Beverly Turner
28W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3.5
Anne Stanton
4W–4L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.74
Shea Carter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.