Teams

LCTA18/Zeif/Danny Jones

18 & Over · 18 & Over LLAS - Men 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-15vs LCTA18/JUMANI/LTP-DIWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Baughman / Cameron Spell vs Lance Fletcher / Christopher Allen6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRob Dauch vs Nicholas Taylor4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBobby Mathes / Slava Zeif vs George Evanko / Ikbal Jumani6-0, 6-1
2025-06-14vs LCTA18/JUMANI/LTP-DIWon 20
W#1 DoublesCameron Spell / Rudy Romano vs Nicholas Taylor / Lance Fletcher6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJason Baughman vs Christopher Allen6-2, 6-0
2025-06-14vs LCTA18/JUMANI/LTP-DIWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Baughman / Rob Dauch vs Christopher Allen / George Evanko6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBobby Mathes vs Nicholas Taylor2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRudy Romano / Cameron Spell vs Lance Fletcher / Ikbal Jumani6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over LLAS - Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Kevin Chisholm
published
2.98
Rudy Romano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Jason Baughman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Cameron Spell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Rob Dauch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.51
Bobby Mathes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.26
Eddy Moore
published
2.05
James Weaver
published 2.5
Slava Zeif
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Spell + Rudy Romano4165% games+14.0% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Rob Dauch7259% games+10.7% vs expected
Slava Zeif + Rob Dauch2349% games+10.1% vs expected
Rob Dauch + Rudy Romano4357% gamesnot enough data
Rob Dauch + Cameron Spell314 matchesnot enough data
Rob Dauch + Jason Baughman404 matchesnot enough data
Cameron Spell + Jason Baughman224 matchesnot enough data
Rudy Romano + Bobby Mathes224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Chisholm
48W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Rudy Romano
46W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jason Baughman
28W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cameron Spell
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rob Dauch
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
2.5
Bobby Mathes
14W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Eddy Moore
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
James Weaver
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Slava Zeif
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.