Teams

HRCA-S NAVY

2026 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-16vs EM GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Kelleher / Leigh Morton vs Cynthia Mejia / Judith Andrews4-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs PTC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanelle Banat / Barbara Kelleher vs Tekla Petrinovich / Christine Trigg6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRebekah Green / Leigh Morton vs Lisa Heichel / Caroline Cook2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-02vs CPCC TEALWon 10
W#3 DoublesPriyanka Khanna / Rebekah Green vs Cassie Bowen / Ashley Geskey6-0, 6-3
2026-05-27vs HRCA-N TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanelle Banat / Barbara Kelleher vs Jessica Campbell / Janice Moneta6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPriyanka Khanna / Leigh Morton vs Caroline Schroback / Jenna Wiles0-6, 4-6
2026-05-26vs GCC GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebekah Green / Priyanka Khanna vs Nell Thomas / Becky Schaub3-6, 3-6
2026-05-05vs GAC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngie Gallagher / Janelle Banat vs Michelle Gruber / Madeline Wallack6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRebekah Green / Leigh Morton vs Laure Mazer / Marci Emerson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPriyanka Khanna / Victoria Mcdermott vs Dana Ondre / Jessica Foster3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Janelle Banat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Sarah Underbrink
published
2.35
Barbara Kelleher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Leigh Morton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Rebekah Green
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.19
Angie Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.96
Priyanka Khanna
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Victoria Mcdermott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Kelleher + Janelle Banat5078% games+25.4% vs expected
Angie Gallagher + Janelle Banat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janelle Banat
21W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Sarah Underbrink
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Barbara Kelleher
6W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Leigh Morton
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Rebekah Green
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Angie Gallagher
7W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Priyanka Khanna
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Victoria Mcdermott
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.