Teams

Nickel

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Men 4.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-24vs AndrusWon 41
W#1 DoublesCameron Farsar / Connor Michelich vs Samuel Andrus / Cory Robertson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRyan Winfree vs Piyush Sabharwall1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEthan Andreasen / Joseph Pigott vs Jonathan Peterson / Aaron Brown6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJared Lamph vs Alden Packer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Pigott / Saul Chessin vs Bobby Arteaga / Mark Waldrup6-2, 6-1
2021-06-22vs NielsenWon 32
W#1 DoublesKevin Albaugh / Connor Michelich vs Tanner Harding / Bryson Smith6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCameron Farsar vs Justin Johnson0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Pigott / Ethan Andreasen vs Daniel Spicer / Benjamin Ortman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSaul Chessin vs Justin Cannon4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Harker / David Pigott vs Ron Osborn / Cory Spicer7-5, 6-1
2021-06-11vs AndrusWon 41
W#1 DoublesConnor Michelich / Cameron Farsar vs Alden Packer / Regan Crone6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSaul Chessin vs Samuel Andrus6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Pigott / Christopher Harker vs Cory Robertson / Bobby Arteaga6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRyan Winfree vs Tyler Pincock6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Pigott / Jared Lamph vs Mark Waldrup / Jeremy Powell6-4, 6-2
2021-06-09vs NielsenLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoseph Pigott / Connor Michelich vs Bryson Smith / Tanner Harding3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCameron Farsar vs Cory Spicer6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Albaugh / David Pigott vs Daniel Spicer / Edwin Norton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Winfree vs Justin Johnson2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChristopher Harker / Jared Lamph vs Steven Nielsen / Barry Smith3-6, 2-6
2021-06-07vs AndrusWon 31
L#1 DoublesJordan Leask / Bridger Smith vs Samuel Andrus / Tyler Pincock3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesConnor Michelich vs Cory Robertson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Pigott / Jacob Lockie vs Brian Nelson / Alden Packer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Harker / Jared Lamph vs Jeremy Powell / Aaron Brown6-3, 6-4
2021-05-27vs NielsenWon 32
L#1 DoublesJoseph Pigott / Ethan Andreasen vs Tanner Harding / Bryson Smith2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCameron Farsar vs Justin Cannon6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Albaugh / Jacob Lockie vs Barry Smith / Benjamin Ortman5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesConnor Michelich vs Justin Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Pigott / Christopher Harker vs Daniel Spicer / Cory Spicer6-3, 6-2
2021-05-17vs NielsenLost 12
L#1 DoublesSaul Chessin / Jacob Lockie vs Tanner Harding / Bryson Smith5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKevin Albaugh vs Yashar Habashi6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Pigott / Cameron Farsar vs Barry Smith / Daniel Spicer4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Pigott
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.87
Jared Lamph
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Bridger Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cameron Farsar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Christopher Harker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Connor Michelich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Ethan Andreasen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jacob Lockie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Leask
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Pigott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Albaugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Ryan Winfree
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Saul Chessin
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Pigott + Christopher Harker303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Pigott + Ethan Andreasen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Pigott
66W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jared Lamph
86W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.87
Bridger Smith
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Cameron Farsar
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Christopher Harker
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Connor Michelich
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ethan Andreasen
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jacob Lockie
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jordan Leask
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Pigott
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Albaugh
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ryan Winfree
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Saul Chessin
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.