Teams

JKarsek (Carmel)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-30vs EAnderson (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChelsea Rhodes vs Devon Fuller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-16vs EBattle (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie O'Shea vs Mary Laird Garrison4-6, 2-6
2024-07-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatie O'Shea vs Tekla Johnson6-1, 6-0
2024-06-11vs SAnderson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatie O'Shea vs Kimberly Daise6-2, 7-5
2024-06-04vs CCox/KEggers (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatie O'Shea vs Katie Eggers6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesChelsea Rhodes vs Elizabeth Stewart6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Katie O'Shea
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Chelsea Rhodes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Caroline Dudley
published 3
2.92
Kelli Narveson
published
2.74
Crystal Allen
published 3
2.33
Emily Hodge
published
Jasmine Karasek
published
Kinzie Bashline
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie O'Shea
100W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Chelsea Rhodes
64W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Caroline Dudley
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kelli Narveson
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Crystal Allen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Emily Hodge
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.33
Jasmine Karasek
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kinzie Bashline
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.