← Teams

GLVR-Zielinski

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Leslie OBrien
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
—
Nancy Garlock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Toni Kidd
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jerilyn Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Launi Smith
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.53
Jennifer Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Ellen Bowman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Linda Graham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.33
Babette Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-06-29Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesCathy Valentine / Launi Smith vs Lisa Gray / Cathi Peck6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesEllen Bowman vs Rhonda Kessinger6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Putsch / Kori Montpas vs Lorrie Vogel / Traci Palo6-0, 6-2
2019-06-23Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Cathy Valentine vs Elise Orban / Trina Denson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Ellen Bowman vs Shannon Dilorenzo / Jennifer Devoe6-2, 6-0
2019-06-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKristy Paratore / Jerilyn Hanson vs Lisa Grant / Rebecca Jacobs6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Linda Graham vs Janet Walker / Noriko Satake3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Ellen Bowman vs Trish Vawter / Lisa Lynch6-1, 7-5
2019-06-08Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Carrie Putsch vs Eileen Reid / Julie Hanson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Amy Foley6-1, 6-2
2019-05-31Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesJerilyn Hanson / Jennifer Simmons vs Cathrine Olander / Yuko Hopman6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLeslie OBrien vs Rebecca Redding6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Garlock / Carrie Putsch vs Deborah Borchers / Teresa Neal6-2, 6-3
2019-05-11Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesEllen Bowman vs Sydney Taggart6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCathy Valentine / Launi Smith vs Leslie Ballard / Alison Marsh Harrison6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Bo Yu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Linda Graham vs Lisa Klein / Jenna Hayes6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2019-04-27Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCarrie Putsch / Jennifer Simmons vs Deanna Lautenbach / Michelle Mehr6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLeslie OBrien / Babette Zielinski vs Kira Dennison Capen / Xia Wu6-2, 6-3
2019-04-19Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesLauni Smith / Linda Graham vs Sheila Bunnell / Nancy Osborne7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKori Montpas / Nancy Garlock vs Sarah Morris / Krissy Wyngarden6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Leslie OBrien
46W–45L career
32%68%1%
3.97
4
Nancy Garlock
29W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Toni Kidd
57W–59L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Jerilyn Hanson
12W–27L career · type A
14%85%1%
3.66
4
Launi Smith
50W–54L career
17%81%2%
3.65
4
Jennifer Simmons
63W–75L career
28%72%0%
3.53
3.5
Ellen Bowman
40W–94L career
0%76%24%
3.52
4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%97%3%
3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.