Teams

WNCA Moran (HRC)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-15vs WNCA Elliot (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Burleson / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Sarah Cochran / Sherrie Voyles4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJaney Cope / ASHLEY MORAN vs Sarah Corley / Kelly Gillis7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Bull / Amanda Nichols vs Tina Kinard / Susan Cook6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-24vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Wendel / Suchada Johnson vs Tracey Walker / Anne Salter2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJaney Cope / ASHLEY MORAN vs Amy Ager / Rebecca Carchman6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Bull / Amanda Nichols vs Elaine Dephouse / Eileen Cohen6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Janey Cope
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
ASHLEY MORAN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Cindy Bull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Vickie Massey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Angelika Drew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.69
Lisa Burleson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Mary Ann Wendel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Sallie LaChance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.49
Kelly Hetherington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Sharlyn Aamodt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Nicole Ingle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Suchada Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelika Drew + Janey Cope7077% games+17.8% vs expected
Angelika Drew + Vickie Massey6264% games+11.3% vs expected
Cindy Bull + ASHLEY MORAN4260% games+4.2% vs expected
ASHLEY MORAN + Janey Cope6362% games+2.6% vs expected
Vickie Massey + Kelly Hetherington134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Wendel + Kelly Hetherington134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Burleson + Cindy Bull213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janey Cope
58W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.85
4
ASHLEY MORAN
28W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Bull
37W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Vickie Massey
34W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
3.5
Angelika Drew
22W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
Lisa Burleson
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Mary Ann Wendel
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Sallie LaChance
137W–131L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Kelly Hetherington
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Sharlyn Aamodt
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Nicole Ingle
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Suchada Johnson
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.