Teams

SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:30PM)/ Capurro

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Men 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-07vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (9AM)/ WursterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTyler LaMont / Tyler Haire vs John Wurster / Steve Gill6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTroy Harlan / Michael Montgomery vs Scott Trulove / Benjamin Bergen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAustin Farres Oriol / Tyler Haire vs Blake Stockstad / Duncan Street6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTroy Harlan / Tyler LaMont vs Dee Domingo / John McCauley3-6, 2-6
2025-11-09vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (9AM)/ ReyesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Haire / Prashanth Vijayaraghavan vs Mustafa Rasheed / David Boston6-4, 7-6
2025-11-02vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (9AM)/ RussellWon 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Haire / Lucas Olson vs Stephen Huber / Jeffrey Bertolini6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTroy Harlan / Lucas Olson vs Shervin Badamchi / Michael McGowan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-28vs SD 3.5 UCRC (11AM)/ ChinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTroy Harlan / Daniel Riding vs Amir Naghshineh-Pour / Arjay Mendoza4-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs SD LLW 3.5 Balboa TC/ GeorgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesTyler Haire / Troy Harlan vs Soon Chye Ho / Matt George3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kristine Nguyen
published
3.40
Tyler Haire
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Bryan Yung
published 3.5
3.38
Tyler LaMont
published
3.27
Richard Moulton
published
Austin Farres Oriol
published 3.5
3.22
William Carey
published
3.21
Daniel Riding
published 3.5
3.15
Troy Harlan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Kevin Clancy
published
2.95
James Capurro
published
2.94
Michael Montgomery
published
2.93
Chase Tashjian
published 3
Lucas Olson
published
Ryan Belcher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Tyler Haire
59W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Bryan Yung
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Tyler LaMont
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Richard Moulton
21W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Austin Farres Oriol
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Carey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Daniel Riding
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Troy Harlan
4W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kevin Clancy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
James Capurro
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Michael Montgomery
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Chase Tashjian
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lucas Olson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Belcher
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.