Teams

SRABBY

2022 Cap Mixed 55 & over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-03vs PROCTER55Split 11
W#1 DoublesJean Haas / John VanDeWater vs Susan Doninger Greer / Thomas Stieber7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Rick Pfeiffer vs Donna Allen / Michael Hamlett2-6, 4-6
2022-07-29vs JSageWon 20
W#1 DoublesJean Haas / John VanDeWater vs Annette Page / John van Campen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Rick Pfeiffer vs Amy Lindsey / Mike Pearce6-3, 7-5
2022-07-27vs LBroadwayLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Glanville / Jean Haas vs Ken Lawton / Marcia Fort2-6, 1-6
2022-07-06vs BFRANCISWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / John VanDeWater vs Mary Cockrill / Scott Mason7-6, 6-3
2022-06-29vs PROCTER55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Ken Glanville vs Rebecca Procter / Michael Marchi4-6, 0-6
2022-06-22vs LBroadwayLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffany Harris / John VanDeWater vs Jane Britt / Jeff Smith3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Tsibulsky / Ray Goldberg vs Mary Hoag / Jeffrey Monaghen6-5
L#3 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Rick Pfeiffer vs Liz Broadway / Ken Lawton3-6, 5-7
2022-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Diamond / Jean Haas vs Mike Pearce / Amy Lindsey7-5, 6-0
2022-06-01vs BFRANCISSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJean Haas / Ray Goldberg vs Mary Cockrill / Rob Butler2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Rick Pfeiffer vs Nina Moock / Bill Francis7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
John Diamond
published
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Ray Goldberg
published
3.44
Ken Glanville
published
3.42
Jean Haas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Stephanie Rabby
published
3.15
Kathleen Tsibulsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Raul Suarez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John VanDeWater + Andrea Pfeiffer3549% gamesnot enough data
John VanDeWater + Jean Haas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Diamond
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
Ray Goldberg
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
Ken Glanville
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Stephanie Rabby
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Kathleen Tsibulsky
53W–118L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 6 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.93
Raul Suarez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.