Teams

France/55/6.5/GACC

2024 NO Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 NO (55&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-02vs Wolf/55/6.5/CypLWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenny Stone / Tracy Giacone vs Renee Rizzo / Alice Versher6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Lafont / JAN COTAYA vs Phyllis Carlson / Elaine Wolf6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDamona Guillera / Truus Muller vs Michelle Simon / Sandy Sievers6-0, 6-0
2024-10-01vs Oreck/55/6.5/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesTruus Muller / Sandra Huston vs Jeannine Thibodaux / Mar'Sue Parro6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Giacone / Nancy Bonifacic vs Cynthia Knight / Linda Flynn-Wilson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJAN COTAYA / Susan Coco vs Mary Sciortino / Rita Lang7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-25vs Oreck/55/6.5/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Theard / Donielle Osborn vs Kris Huete / Jeannine Thibodaux6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Huston / Susan Coco vs Linda Flynn-Wilson / Julie Oreck6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Giacone / Nancy Bonifacic vs Mary Sciortino / Donna Clark6-3, 6-2
2024-09-24vs Wolf/55/6.5/CypLWon 30
W#1 DoublesLila Rivas / Damona Guillera vs Phyllis Carlson / Alice Versher6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Lafont / Tracy Giacone vs Sandy Sievers / Anne Dantin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Bonifacic / Laura Russo vs Lori Walker / Michelle Simon6-2, 6-0
2024-09-18vs Broussard/55/6.5/MCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia France / Laura Russo vs Lisa Yarborough / Kathryn Wild4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Theard / Damona Guillera vs Leslie Fawer / Liz Nance4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJenny Stone / Laurie Norris vs Jan Tolar / Kathleen Kazour6-3, 6-2
2024-08-28vs Broussard/55/6.5/MCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobin Lafont / Damona Guillera vs Leslie Fawer / Kathryn Wild4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Theard / Donielle Osborn vs Lisa Yarborough / Kathleen Kazour4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia France / Laurie Norris vs Kathryn Broussard / Lori Rabito6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 NO (55&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1France/55/6.5/GACC511539107
2Broussard/55/6.5/MCC5113512116
3Oreck/55/6.5/CP2451326166
4Wolf/55/6.5/CypL0631533201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jenny Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Robin Lafont
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Patricia France
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Lila Rivas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Claudia Theard
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Susan Coco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Nancy Bonifacic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Tracy Giacone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Damona Guillera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Laura Russo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Donielle Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
JAN COTAYA
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Sandra Huston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laurie Norris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Truus Muller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Giacone + Laurie Norris15169% games+10.4% vs expected
Claudia Theard + Robin Lafont1540% games−9.3% vs expected
Tracy Giacone + Jenny Stone224 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Theard + Donielle Osborn213 matchesnot enough data
Truus Muller + Susan Coco123 matchesnot enough data
Damona Guillera + Jenny Stone213 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Stone + Robin Lafont213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Stone
90W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Robin Lafont
19W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Patricia France
12W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
Lila Rivas
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Claudia Theard
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Susan Coco
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Nancy Bonifacic
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Tracy Giacone
59W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Damona Guillera
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Russo
31W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Donielle Osborn
17W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
JAN COTAYA
13W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.62
Sandra Huston
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.46
Laurie Norris
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Truus Muller
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.