Teams

Klocke SJ

2022 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · MEN 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesKen Klocke / Steve Gangeme vs Peter Cerra Sr / David Goodare6-3, 6-4
2022-04-23vs LEATHWon 10
W#1 DoublesKen Klocke / Jeff Watts vs William Leath / George McGrath3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-06vs O’Connor 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Klocke / Richard Hughes vs Young O'Connor / Rob Romero6-4, 6-4
2022-04-02vs Arnold/Baggett HTRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Klocke / Steve Gangeme vs Edward Knox / Michael Pechersky6-1, 6-2
2022-03-26vs LEATHWon 10
W#1 DoublesKen Klocke / Steve Gangeme vs John Schoolfield / Gerard Schwartzel6-0, 6-0
2022-03-23vs Parker HTRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Klocke / Steve Gangeme vs Robert Folchi / Colin Chapman6-1, 6-0
2022-03-12vs Arnold/Baggett HTRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Breen / Ken Klocke vs Joe Baggett / Garrett Thompson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-07vs O’Connor 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesKen Klocke / Michael Breen vs Han-Leong Goh / Cliff Sass7-5, 6-0
2022-02-28vs LEATHWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Klocke / Paul Guerrette vs MacK Heath / Paul Haskins7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ken Klocke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Dennis Werner
published 4
3.66
Michael Breen
published
3.48
Paul Guerrette
published
3.45
James Brownfield
published 3.5
3.39
Jeff Watts
published
Clifford Howard
published 3.5
Richard Hughes
published
Timothy Reilly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Guerrette + James Brownfield033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ken Klocke
103W–40L career · type A · 9 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Dennis Werner
27W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
Michael Breen
15W–18L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Paul Guerrette
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
James Brownfield
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jeff Watts
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Clifford Howard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Hughes
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Reilly
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.