Teams

YTC-Yakima Smashers

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-14vs PC-HolleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKerry Steele / James Degrasse vs Kristi Dawson / Pane Stankovic7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaphne Reilly / Danny Sanchez vs Austen Hebdon / Jolene Boughton1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKandice Cross / Quinn Plant vs Chad Dawson / Angela Cragin6-0, 6-3
2023-10-14vs WCCP-All Mixed UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesKerry Steele / James Degrasse vs Laura Temby / Zachary Ferriell4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaphne Reilly / Danny Sanchez vs Kelli Geris / Mario Piergallini1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiberty McLean / Scott Stephen vs Ramona Higashi / Joshua Cantu7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-10-13vs PC-GavinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Stephen / Liberty McLean vs Erica Clontz / Roman Gavino6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Sanchez / Daphne Reilly vs Moe Davari / Debbie Meyers7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesQuinn Plant / Kandice Cross vs Emerson Clark / Jennifer Cunnington1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Brooks40111575
2WCCP-All Mixed Up3081780
3PC-Holle2163974
4YTC-Yakima Smashers12361387
5YTC-Kiss Our Aces134818119
6PC-Gavino03181799

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Daphne Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Quinn Plant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Danny Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Kerry Steele
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Scott Stephen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kandice Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Liberty McLean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Degrasse + Kerry Steele134 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Steele + Quinn Plant404 matchesnot enough data
Quinn Plant + Daphne Reilly303 matchesnot enough data
Danny Sanchez + Daphne Reilly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daphne Reilly
40W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 2 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Quinn Plant
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Danny Sanchez
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
Kerry Steele
66W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Scott Stephen
59W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Kandice Cross
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Liberty McLean
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.