Teams

ESB:ELLISON

2021 VT Adult 65 & Over Women · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-08vs OC:Prime Time:FoulkLost 02
L#1 DoublesLiz Demas / Kathi Roesler vs Rebecca Foulk / Judith Jackson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Hauf / Cecily Robbins vs Carole McNamee / Sandra Pomeroy6-1, 5-6
2021-08-08vs OC:Prime Time:FoulkSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCecily Robbins / Joan Hauf vs Joan Holcombe / Fe Ramos2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Sherburne / Andrea Torello vs Priscilla Geoghegan / Sandra Pomeroy6-3, 6-3
2021-08-01vs OC:Prime Time:FoulkWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Sherburne / Andrea Torello vs Marcy Galligan / Kathy Yost6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrigid Chick / Annmarie Plant vs Joan Holcombe / Priscilla Geoghegan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Demas / Kathi Roesler vs Karen Andresen / Fe Ramos7-6, 4-2
2021-08-01vs OC:Prime Time:FoulkWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Sherburne / Andrea Torello vs Marion Hampton / Carole McNamee6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLiz Demas / Kathi Roesler vs Judith Jackson / Rebecca Foulk6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrigid Chick / Annmarie Plant vs Karen Andresen / Kathy Yost2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:ELLISON226612109
2OC:Prime Time:Foulk226613108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Cynthia Sherburne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Dawn Bugbee
published 3.5
Andrea Torello
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Annmarie Plant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Brigid Chick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cecily Robbins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Donna Ellison
published
Joan Hauf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathi Roesler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Liz Demas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mimi Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi Roesler + Liz Demas213 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Sherburne + Andrea Torello303 matchesnot enough data
Donna Ellison + Dawn Bugbee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Sherburne
30W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Dawn Bugbee
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88
Andrea Torello
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Annmarie Plant
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Brigid Chick
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Cecily Robbins
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Donna Ellison
7W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joan Hauf
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathi Roesler
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Liz Demas
18W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mimi Pearson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.