Teams

Hooper/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-16vs Lee/Frame/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKatherine Cigarran / Erica Oliver vs Suzanne Eubank / Mary Elam Polk6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCollins Hooper vs Jenny East6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoellyn Helman / Jean Spengler vs Julie LaLance / Jennifer Kelley2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRachel Albright vs Caroline Houck6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMemma Warfield / Stefanie Carter vs Pamela Hicks / Joy Owens6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tracy Burch
published
3.94
Sarah Benton
published
3.81
Stefanie Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Alison Warner
published 4
3.69
3.62
Rachel Albright
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Karly Hart
published
3.58
Stuart Smothers
published
3.54
Memma Warfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Collins Hooper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Jean Spengler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Lindsey Hundley
published
3.40
Erica Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Joellyn Helman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Cigarran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Burch + Sarah Benton404 matchesnot enough data
Jean Spengler + Joellyn Helman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Burch
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Sarah Benton
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Stefanie Carter
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Alison Warner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Caroline McWilliams
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Catherine Schaufele
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Rachel Albright
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Karly Hart
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Stuart Smothers
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Memma Warfield
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Collins Hooper
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Jean Spengler
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Lindsey Hundley
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Erica Oliver
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Joellyn Helman
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29
Katherine Cigarran
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.