← Teams

MAC-Bilstrom

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shannon Bilstrom
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
—
June Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Michaela Bancud
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Tara Hendrickson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
published 3.5
—
Katy Marcy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results6 ties
2021-07-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Gina Wissmiller vs Ellen Bowman / Kara Gajowskyj6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaty Marcy / Rebecca Roberts vs Hideko Kershaw / Beth Steffes6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJune Kim / Terri Gotcher vs Philippa Stasiuk / Vivian Nguyen7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTara Hendrickson / Rebecca Roberts vs Leah Buxman / Elise Anderson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Terri Gotcher vs Sara van Beckum / Kirsten Holmes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Barker / Jeanette Thomas vs Elizabeth Schwarz / Gabriela McIntosh6-3, 6-3
2021-06-27Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Shannon Bilstrom vs Kirsten Giacomini / Alix Edwards6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Kristen Benkstein7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJune Kim / Katy Marcy vs Catherine Crosby / Jill Chapman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Linda Barker vs Amy Bucher / Shamera Daugherty6-3, 6-3
2021-06-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKaty Marcy / Rebecca Roberts vs Linda Barr / Jennifer Richman6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Linda Barker vs Judith Kobin / Kim Regalado6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Michaela Bancud vs Anne Fahlbusch / Colleen Stroeder6-3, 6-1
2021-06-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Gina Wissmiller vs Katherine Kralj / Cathryn Hansen4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Tami McAra4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Barker / Dana McKillop vs Rise Hawley / Misty Bettis7-5, 6-4
2021-06-06Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Katy Marcy vs Christy Grisham / Denielle Edlund3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Jenny Pizot7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Jill Craven vs Holly Kanz / Danielle Cuenco6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Linda Barker vs May Albano / Ashleigh Kayser6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
—
4
June Kim
20W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Michaela Bancud
26W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Tara Hendrickson
71W–65L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10
0
Katy Marcy
28W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.