Teams

WI Combo MALT 6.5 M Sendelbach

2025 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Gee / Charlie Oberman vs Sanghyeok Park / Daniel DeJarlais1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin Mccluskey / Alfonso Valdez-robledo vs Arun Baxter / Stephen Schaak1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCole Ledrowski / Matthew Thomas vs Timur Mavlyutov / Chase Peck3-6, 1-6
2025-09-23vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 03
L#1 DoublesWesley Kokomoor / Alfred Sun vs Timur Mavlyutov / Edward Halsted6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Jimmy Yao vs Chase Peck / Stephen Schaak0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSendelbach Sendelbach / Santiago Barquin vs Seth Dailey / Arlen Ostreng3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-16vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 12
L#1 DoublesCole Ledrowski / Matthew Thomas vs Nithin Sathyamoorthy / Arun Baxter1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlexander Gee / Joe Munns vs Rolf Edwards / Sanghyeok Park0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSendelbach Sendelbach / Santiago Barquin vs Daniel DeJarlais / Edward Halsted6-4, 6-1
2025-09-09vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSendelbach Sendelbach / Santiago Barquin vs Rolf Edwards / Arun Baxter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Thomas / Alexander Gee vs Timur Mavlyutov / Chase Peck3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCole Ledrowski / Joe Munns vs Stephen Schaak / Arlen Ostreng2-6, 2-6
2025-09-02vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Matthew Thomas vs Seth Dailey / Arlen Ostreng6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartin Mccluskey / Wesley Kokomoor vs Sanghyeok Park / Nithin Sathyamoorthy2-6, 2-6
2025-08-26vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJimmy Yao / Alfred Sun vs Rolf Edwards / Timur Mavlyutov1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlfonso Valdez-robledo / Joe Munns vs Nithin Sathyamoorthy / Sanghyeok Park2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Mccluskey / Cole Ledrowski vs Chase Peck / Daniel DeJarlais1-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 03
L#1 DoublesCole Ledrowski / Jimmy Yao vs Rolf Edwards / Seth Dailey0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Wesley Kokomoor vs Arlen Ostreng / Sanghyeok Park3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Li / Alexander Gee vs Edward Halsted / Stephen Schaak0-6, 2-6
2025-08-12vs WI Combo MALT 6.5 M DeJarlaisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSendelbach Sendelbach / Santiago Barquin vs Nithin Sathyamoorthy / Seth Dailey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Kokomoor / Alfred Sun vs Rolf Edwards / Sanghyeok Park3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlfonso Valdez-robledo / Martin Mccluskey vs Edward Halsted / Daniel DeJarlais6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Alfred Sun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Alfonso Valdez-robledo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Sendelbach Sendelbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Charlie Oberman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Corey Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Martin Mccluskey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Alexander Gee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Joe Munns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cole Ledrowski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jimmy Yao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Santiago Barquin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wesley Kokomoor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Santiago Barquin + Sendelbach Sendelbach134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alfred Sun
44W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Alfonso Valdez-robledo
0W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Sendelbach Sendelbach
1W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Charlie Oberman
7W–13L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Corey Li
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Martin Mccluskey
5W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Alexander Gee
2W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Joe Munns
3W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.70
2.5
Cole Ledrowski
0W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jimmy Yao
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Santiago Barquin
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wesley Kokomoor
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.