Teams

D.Farmer3.0W

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-14vs K.Levine/WaychoffLost 01
L#3 DoublesTammera Hill / Latoya Clay vs Catherine Walton / Katie Warren2-6, 1-6
2023-05-07vs I.Navarro GalisteoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Rebecca Faries / Ann Pershke6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Ann Garey3-6, 1-6
2023-04-23vs B.LeippeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacie White / Tamara Faulkner vs Ngoc Tran / Jennifer Wolborsky6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLatoya Clay / MaryAdelaide Riddick vs Marie Gelston / Wendy Sielaty2-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs K.Gilreath 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesTamara Faulkner / Natasha Tyson vs Katelyn Applegate / Laurel Saunders6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Kristi Gilreath / Cathy Williams6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLatoya Clay / Barbara Williams vs Erin Wynia / Tina Goertz0-6, 3-6
2023-04-07vs K.HarrisWon 20
W#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Lisa Hammond6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Kristen Harris / Cooper Thornhill6-0, 6-2
2023-03-19vs J.Brock 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelsey Barrasso / Megan Barrasso vs Jan Copeland / Britt Tolliver6-4, 6-2
2023-03-17vs A.Cuni/M.LynchSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTamara Faulkner / Natasha Tyson vs Megan Lynch / Maureen Doherty6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Heidi McCann0-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dempsey Farmer
published 4.5
3.35
Stacie White
published
3.01
Dr Amy Linder
published
3.00
Tamara Faulkner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Latoya Clay
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.83
Kelsey Barrasso
published
2.82
Megan Barrasso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.34
Melissa Hunter
published
Tammera Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Barrasso + Kelsey Barrasso5459% games+7.3% vs expected
Stacie White + Dr Amy Linder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dempsey Farmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacie White
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Dr Amy Linder
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Tamara Faulkner
59W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
2.5
Latoya Clay
89W–62L career · 9 lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.84
Kelsey Barrasso
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Megan Barrasso
37W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
MaryAdelaide Riddick
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Melissa Hunter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammera Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.