Teams

Sasson (Fisher Island)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 3.5 Adut 18 & over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.31 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-10vs Miami Racket ClubSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Bitensky / Angel Nicolas vs Edgar Sarli / Charles Brewer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJames Deering vs Alan Bublath0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Sasson / Ricardo Fuhrken vs Bert Hucks / Will Haugland6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesArnaud Tibi vs Martin Canada2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adut 18 & over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
James Deering
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Jorge Escasena
published
3.49
Leandro Antonaccio
published
3.42
David Chene
published 3.5
3.38
Ricardo Fuhrken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Angel Nicolas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brian Lorber
published 3.5
3.23
Ryan Sasson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jorge Torruella
published
3.22
Matthew Coit
published
3.18
Arnaud Tibi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
KIRILL ANOSOV
published
Andrew Zaro
published 3
David Berkman
published 3
2.60
BRADLEY YOUNG
published 3
Michael Bitensky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Sasson + Ricardo Fuhrken6750% games−0.6% vs expected
Matthew Coit + Arnaud Tibi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Deering
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.57
Jorge Escasena
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Leandro Antonaccio
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
David Chene
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Ricardo Fuhrken
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Angel Nicolas
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Brian Lorber
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Sasson
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jorge Torruella
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Matthew Coit
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Arnaud Tibi
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
KIRILL ANOSOV
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.96
3
Andrew Zaro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
David Berkman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
BRADLEY YOUNG
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Michael Bitensky
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.