Teams

RAY

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-01vs Rhodenhiser CFCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Head vs Sarah Bulluck6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDebbie Beal vs Anniegray Holt0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Lily Murray1-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs CurleyWon 30
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Head vs Amy Ford6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKayla Barrio vs Chanda Antoon6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Ericka Kopriva6-0, 6-0
2025-02-15vs Walston Singles 2025Won 21
L#1 SinglesDebbie Beal vs Melissa Flaugh2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Laurel Shambley6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Rachael Walston7-5, 6-1
2025-02-12vs ConnorWon 30
W#1 SinglesJaime Helms vs Abigail Lindquist6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMacKenzie Head vs Lauren Iammatteo6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Caroline Canfield6-3, 6-2
2025-02-08vs Rommelmeyer 2.5 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Donalda Cairney3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJaime Helms vs Kim Balderson6-0, 6-0
2025-02-03vs CurleyLost 12
L#1 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Kathleen Curley4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJaime Helms vs Cameron Smithwick4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Samantha Benford6-1, 6-3
2025-02-02vs ConnorSplit 11
L#2 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Nicole Mejia3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Caroline Canfield6-1, 6-1
2025-02-01vs Rhodenhiser CFCCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJaime Helms vs Anna Shields6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKayla Barrio vs Megan Konrady3-6, 4-6
2025-01-29vs Walston Singles 2025Won 10
W#1 SinglesYAEL UZIEL vs Laurel Shambley6-0, 6-2
2025-01-13vs Rommelmeyer 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJaime Helms vs Kim Smith6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKayla Barrio vs Tammy Kuypers3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesNatalie Addy vs Pamela Rommelmeyer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
MacKenzie Head
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Jaime Helms
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.30
YAEL UZIEL
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Debbie Beal
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Kayla Barrio
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Natalie Addy
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MacKenzie Head
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Jaime Helms
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
YAEL UZIEL
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Debbie Beal
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Barrio
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Natalie Addy
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.