Teams

FCCC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-12vs LTSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJane Roberti vs Janet Krech2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Skold / Amy Artzer vs Ewa Pawlak / Cristine Carpenter6-3, 6-1
2021-06-28vs MLF YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJane Roberti vs Andrea Flake0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Skold / Amy Artzer vs Liz Cundall / Kimberley Pascavis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-14vs LVTAWon 10
W#1 SinglesJane Roberti vs Jeanice Prohs6-0, 6-1
2021-06-07vs LTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMolly Skold / Terese Shanley vs Deborah Lockwood / Janice Sale2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Roberti vs Janet Krech6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Crystal Osthoff
published 3
2.80
Teresa Girardi
published
2.74
Kara Brown
published
2.72
Molly Skold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kathleen Tremblay
published
2.63
Jane Roberti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
Shannon Holt
published
2.52
Nicole Holmes
published
2.45
Denise Benz
published 3
Amy Artzer
published
Mindee Metz
published
Tara Leman
published
Terese Shanley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Holt + Denise Benz2647% games+2.1% vs expected
Kara Brown + Kathleen Tremblay3450% games−0.0% vs expected
Crystal Osthoff + Kathleen Tremblay4747% games−8.6% vs expected
Nicole Holmes + Denise Benz2539% games−11.8% vs expected
Jane Roberti + Molly Skold2345% gamesnot enough data
Kara Brown + Nicole Holmes134 matchesnot enough data
Kara Brown + Crystal Osthoff134 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Holt + Nicole Holmes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Crystal Osthoff
52W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
Teresa Girardi
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Kara Brown
24W–34L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Molly Skold
45W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
Kathleen Tremblay
22W–28L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Jane Roberti
66W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Shannon Holt
9W–18L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
2.56
Nicole Holmes
26W–38L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Denise Benz
15W–29L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.45
Amy Artzer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mindee Metz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Leman
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terese Shanley
31W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.