Teams

LVTA PURPLE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-12vs TAG ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Petersen / Dennis Flanigan vs Robin Wick / Douglas Keever0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Less vs Robert Herrera4-6, 0-6
2023-07-05vs FCCC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJared Petersen / Dennis Flanigan vs Josh Shelby / Sean Tomlinson2-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs MLF BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Adam Less vs Jeff Brauch / Scott Daigle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-21vs CSU WHITESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Adam Less vs Chet Reistad / Ted Ray5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Alan Krech vs Dave Rizzotto / Rick Wehmeyer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-14vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Adam Less vs Michael Baker / Kelley Axe6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Kenneth Keller vs Jim Kelly / Mark Sundstedt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-07vs HMTC BLACKWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Forest Dixon vs Kent Mueller / John Beggs6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Adam Less
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Jared Petersen
published
3.65
Eric Sutherland
published
3.60
Greg Jette
published
3.56
Alan Krech
published 4
3.55
Dennis Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.55
Kenneth Keller
published
3.45
Forest Dixon
published
3.17
David Jeffries
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forest Dixon + Alan Krech3344% games−7.4% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Adam Less6257% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Kenneth Keller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Less
76W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jared Petersen
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
Eric Sutherland
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Greg Jette
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Alan Krech
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.56
4
Dennis Flanigan
52W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kenneth Keller
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Forest Dixon
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
David Jeffries
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.