Teams

EFrederick/LRogers (Foxcroft East)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-27vs EEisenbaum (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnnie Spence / Micah Caruana vs Gladys Shinmoto / Linda Notarangelo0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-20vs AEagan (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmber Filingeri / Haley Cheek vs Lisa Leake / Kristin Kapur1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargo Cash / Micah Caruana vs Jamie Zarambo / Christine Rasmussen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-13vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMicah Caruana / Christina Chandler vs Allison Broemel / Jazzmin Romero2-6, 1-6
2022-08-23vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMicah Caruana / Elizabeth Frederick vs Tyler Brody / Shelley Crocker3-6, 1-6
2022-08-16vs MMcSherry (PCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMicah Caruana / Annie Spence vs Carla Ackels / Lauren McNeely7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Kreth / Amber Filingeri vs Kristin Salina / Chris Reynolds6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-08-09vs SBurke (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmber Troxell / Micah Caruana vs Shannon Burke / Marie Foley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Mallory Zvara
published
3.42
Leigh Rogers
published
3.06
Elizabeth Jack
published 3
2.85
Amber Troxell
published 3
2.81
Amber Filingeri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Haley Cheek
published 3
2.79
Micah Caruana
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Annie Spence
published 3
2.74
Ashley Kreth
published 3
2.69
Alexandra Wendt
published 2.5
2.59
Margo Cash
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Rogers + Mallory Zvara4259% games+8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Zvara
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Leigh Rogers
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
3
Elizabeth Jack
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Amber Troxell
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Amber Filingeri
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Haley Cheek
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Micah Caruana
5W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Annie Spence
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ashley Kreth
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Alexandra Wendt
7W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Elizabeth Frederick
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Margo Cash
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.