Teams

LTA

2021 CTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-13vs HMTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeonard Martinez / Dan McGlothlin vs DOUGLAS MAYHEW / Kent Mueller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-30vs FCCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan McGlothlin / Leonard Martinez vs Bruce Malloy / Joseph Maurier6-2, 6-2
2021-07-23vs HMTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Ackermann / Dan McGlothlin vs DOUGLAS MAYHEW / Gary Westlind7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-21vs FCCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan McGlothlin / Leonard Martinez vs Robin Wick / Jim Kelly2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-09vs MLFWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeonard Martinez / Dan McGlothlin vs Ernest Chavez / Bradley Bischoff6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Leonard Martinez
published
3.66
Ed Kellogg
published 3.5
3.65
Richard Stitt
published 3.5
3.61
Scott Hemphill
published
3.52
Dan McGlothlin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Jon Messick
published
Klaus Weickmann
published
Larry Kilgore
published
Mark Ackermann
published
Richard Kostecki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Klaus Weickmann + Leonard Martinez6160% gamesnot enough data
Dan McGlothlin + Ed Kellogg3251% gamesnot enough data
Jon Messick + Ed Kellogg5070% gamesnot enough data
Dan McGlothlin + Mark Ackermann314 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stitt + Ed Kellogg314 matchesnot enough data
Richard Kostecki + Richard Stitt213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stitt + Scott Hemphill213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stitt + Leonard Martinez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leonard Martinez
49W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Ed Kellogg
58W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%10%90%
3.66
3.5
Richard Stitt
46W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%12%88%
3.65
Scott Hemphill
30W–27L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dan McGlothlin
91W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
Jon Messick
19W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Klaus Weickmann
17W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Larry Kilgore
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Ackermann
10W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Kostecki
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.