Teams

GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-20vs LAyala (Hornets Nest)Split 11
W#1 SinglesChristopher Gowin vs Jared McKiernan6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesShivam Desai vs Paul Fackler3-6, 3-6
2026-07-18vs JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesGuilherme Dumit vs Jesse Olmstead6-3, 4-4
L#2 SinglesAndrew Schulz vs Adrian Mendoza2-6, 1-2
2026-06-29vs JMarks (PCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesChristopher Gowin vs Chris Tomlinson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGuilherme Dumit vs Jim Marks7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesPedro Pinassi vs Bernardo Llerenas6-2, 6-2
2026-06-15vs TBixler (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesSahil Vasa vs Thomas Bixler1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShivam Desai vs Matthew Glapiak6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAndrew Schulz vs Charlie Reiney4-6, 3-6
2026-06-09vs WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 SinglesGuilherme Dumit vs Mathias Schmidt2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSahil Vasa vs Matthew Baum6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAndrew Schulz vs Jason Rickel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-07vs LAyala (Hornets Nest)Won 21
W#1 SinglesPedro Pinassi vs Paul Fackler6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShivam Desai vs Pete Eakin2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMichael Szabo vs Jordan Paterra6-2, 6-2
2026-05-18vs JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMichael Szabo vs Jesse Olmstead2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGuilherme Dumit vs Arjun Som Sekhar6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesShivam Desai vs Adrian Mendoza3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBixler (Queens)6218614158
2WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)6217718170
3LAyala (Hornets Nest)44141025186
4GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park)35101430216
5JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)3561838255
6JMarks (PCC)1751939244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Guilherme Dumit
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.38
Christopher Gowin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Pedro Pinassi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.23
Sahil Vasa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.19
Andrew Schulz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Michael Szabo
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.07
Shivam Desai
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Guilherme Dumit
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Christopher Gowin
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Pedro Pinassi
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
Sahil Vasa
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Andrew Schulz
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
Michael Szabo
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.09
Shivam Desai
3W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.