Teams

B7 Avalon Wade Wonderwomen

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarineth Kight / Diana Dull vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-20vs B2 ACAC Davis-BlackburnWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarineth Kight / Anna Baird vs Pamela Blackburn / Susan Winckler6-2, 7-6
2023-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarineth Kight / Donna Hall vs Janet Miller / Kristen Powers3-2
2023-07-30vs B3 RCC KochLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Schooley / Marineth Kight vs Pam Koch / Amy Wozniak6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-22vs B6 WOCC HamlinWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Tankersley / Marineth Kight vs Catherine Matawaran / Jenny Norfleet6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Diana Dull
published 3.5
3.21
Donna Wade
published
3.07
Donna Hall
published
3.06
Marineth Kight
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Felicia Schooley
published
2.99
Jeannie Wyant
published
2.96
Mary Tankersley
published
2.83
Anna Baird
published 3
Tina Hicks
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Dull
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Donna Wade
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Donna Hall
14W–20L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
Felicia Schooley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Jeannie Wyant
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
Mary Tankersley
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Anna Baird
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
Tina Hicks
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.