Teams

Su.Rose55C

2023 Cap Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-25vs Da.Miller55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Susan Rose vs Jamie Kerzner / Christine Subasic6-3, 6-4
2023-09-18vs Da.Weiland55CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Noelle Jackson vs Julie Fleming / Leigh Kimball4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-11vs Ja.Terrell55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Karen Cody vs Catherine Brawner / Suzanne Brown7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWanda Wilson / Susan Doninger Greer vs Helen Harris / Kim McDonald0-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs Le.Corn55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberley Matthews / India Pleasants vs Susan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky6-2, 6-3
2023-08-21vs Le.Magee55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Cody / Kimberley Matthews vs Lynn Trefzger / Susan King6-2, 6-2
2023-08-14vs An.Ashburn55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Rose / Kimberley Matthews vs Mary Cockrill / Cynthia White6-2, 6-2
2023-08-07vs Ta.LeFevre55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Jacobs / Kimberley Matthews vs Tara LeFevre / Sarah Bell6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Noelle Jackson
published
3.63
Kimberley Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.54
Lori Mayes
published
3.38
Susan Doninger Greer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.33
3.28
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.27
Leslie O'Brien
published
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
published
3.06
Karen Cody
published
2.89
Malinda Schantz
published
2.73
Wanda Wilson
published
2.61
India Pleasants
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Doninger Greer + Kimberley Matthews6548% games+2.1% vs expected
India Pleasants + Wanda Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kimberley Matthews
137W–107L career · 11 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Lori Mayes
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Susan Doninger Greer
97W–125L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
4
Elizabeth Samuels
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.33
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Leslie O'Brien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Lynda Blelloch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.20
Karen Cody
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Malinda Schantz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Wanda Wilson
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
India Pleasants
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.