Teams

Team 8 Next Ride

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.61 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-15vs Team 9 D. KongWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarter Wilkinson / Lenny Williams vs Kevin Fennell / Stephen Dupuy6-1, 6-3
2022-03-28vs Team 2 Arlington AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesShanmuganathan Arumugam / Jose Miguel Sacin vs Mikhail Velasco / Frank Pan6-2, 6-0
2022-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesJim Leveque / Stephen Gotts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-05vs Team 1 WGCC-A2Split 11
L#1 DoublesNathan Bergman / Jim Leveque vs Josh MacFarland / John Bruner6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJose Miguel Sacin vs Rob Andreev6-2, 6-1
2022-02-28vs Team 7 District AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Viar / Jose Miguel Sacin vs STEPHEN ROMIG / David Williams6-0, 6-1
2022-01-31vs Team 5Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Gotts / Lenny Williams vs Robert Fulton / David Cross6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jose Miguel Sacin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
David Viar
published 3.5
3.64
Jim Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.30
3.27
Christopher Swider
published 3.5
3.21
Tanzid Shams
published
3.21
Florin Iancu
published 3.5
3.10
Ashok Vasam
published 3.5
3.10
Kevin McKeel
published 3.5
3.08
Lenny Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
2.93
Glenn Hall
published 3.5
Stephen Gotts
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jose Miguel Sacin
232W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
3.68
4
Jim Leveque
172W–202L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Shanmuganathan Arumugam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christopher Swider
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Tanzid Shams
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Florin Iancu
30W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ashok Vasam
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Kevin McKeel
90W–97L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lenny Williams
68W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Glenn Hall
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
Stephen Gotts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.