Teams

4-CChambers-DFC

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-27vs 2-LPetree-UNCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Madison Harmon6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Alli Kintner1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBren Woods vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-20vs 5-KLeib-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Kathleen Cannon3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Morgan Blount2-6, 1-6
2023-07-17vs 1-APlachco-EnoLost 02
L#2 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Ana Plachco3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Elaine Schnabel0-6, 2-6
2023-07-13vs 3-GSmith-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Geraldine Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Beth Huebner3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesChrista McGill vs Elizabeth Wyngaarden6-1, 6-3
2023-07-10vs 2-LPetree-UNCLost 02
L#1 SinglesBren Woods vs Julia Howard3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Alli Kintner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-08vs 1-APlachco-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Zoe Dubrow2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Elaine Schnabel0-6, 5-7
2023-05-25vs 5-KLeib-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnna Tomkins vs Kim El2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBren Woods vs Amy Benton6-0, 6-3
2023-05-22vs 3-GSmith-HRSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Beth Huebner4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Alexandra Millholland6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Katie Neal
published
4.20
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.95
Bren Woods
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Chanel Chambers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.58
Christa McGill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.47
Betsy Shane
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bren Woods + Anna Tomkins23472% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Neal
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Bren Woods
77W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
4
Betsy Shane
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.