Teams

TP Tennis Junkies - C. Sparks

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over - Night · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Night - Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-07vs TYCC - H. MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Sparks / Pamela Woodham vs Stephanie Rumbley / Shannon Roark6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Sherry Peterson vs Molly James / Mary Elise Rising6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Arment / Tricia Cardoso vs Tricia Barno / Jennifer Carlson6-1, 6-1
2023-05-30vs Avila - M. MillikenLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Davis / Cindy Sparks vs Michelle Fitz-Randolph / Marguerite Milliken1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Peterson / Amy Rairigh vs Dorothy Flair / Leisa Frye6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Marinez / Delores Hall vs Juanita Vila / Barbara Murray6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-25vs Tampa Palm Mixed Nuts - Q. TonnuLost 01
L#3 DoublesPat Morris / Katherine Grichnik vs Claudia George / Annmarie Iwanicki4-6, 0-6
2023-04-18vs Buckhorn Acers - S. MosherLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Arment / Tricia Cardoso vs Helene Daniel / Daisy Vasquez5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Davis / Cindy Sparks vs Latoya Carter / Maria Karina Espinoza6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPat Morris / Carmen Heggen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesPat Morris / Cindy Sparks vs Limbi Yuce / Asha Grover6-4, 6-2
2023-04-04vs Cheval Smashionistas - J. UrbanLost 01
L#3 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Linda Davis vs Anjali Singh / Niki Kadakia6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Night - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Lisa Marinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.74
Amy Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cindy Arment
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
2.72
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Pamela Woodham
published
2.55
Roseann McNichol
published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
2.51
Katherine Grichnik
published
2.30
Pat Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Arment + Tricia Cardoso151453% games+4.5% vs expected
Cindy Sparks + Pat Morris4744% gamesnot enough data
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Roseann McNichol + Carmen Heggen134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Sparks + Lisa Marinez123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Arment + Carmen Heggen213 matchesnot enough data
Pat Morris + Lisa Marinez123 matchesnot enough data
Roseann McNichol + Theresa Mays213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Marinez
122W–115L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Cindy Arment
50W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth DeConti
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
Pamela Woodham
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Roseann McNichol
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Katherine Grichnik
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Pat Morris
31W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.