Teams

Holstein 65+ 7.5 DAY

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 65 & over · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-25vs Wise/Thompson - DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesCliff Zoller / Jeff Walker vs Garrett Thompson / Peter Weppler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGary Milner / Paul Friedland vs Franklin Cassada / Cliff Sass2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Horvath / Donald Murphy vs Mike Richez / Rick Royall7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Cliff Zoller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Daniel Hicks
published 4
3.78
Steve Horvath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jerry Klawitter
published
3.70
Gary Milner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Paul Friedland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Donald Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Paul Guerrette
published
3.42
Mike Holstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Steven Kolb
published
Richard Hughes
published
Scott Seal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Holstein + Jerry Klawitter3352% games+8.5% vs expected
Steve Horvath + Gary Milner10257% games+2.9% vs expected
Jerry Klawitter + Daniel Hicks314 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holstein + Steve Horvath123 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holstein + Gary Milner213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holstein + Steven Kolb213 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Klawitter + Steven Kolb123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Hicks + Scott Seal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cliff Zoller
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Daniel Hicks
25W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Steve Horvath
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
Jerry Klawitter
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Gary Milner
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Paul Friedland
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Donald Murphy
35W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Paul Guerrette
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Mike Holstein
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
Steven Kolb
25W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Richard Hughes
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Seal
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.