Teams

LCTA40/Eckhardt/MPR

2022 USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles-LCTA · 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.11 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Erik Loesch
published 4.5
Andrew Haefner
published 4.5
4.01
Eric Blackstone
published 4.5
3.99
William Estes
published
3.89
Juliann Loesch
published
3.71
3.70
Charles Claus
published 4
3.64
Debra Mulholland
published 4
3.59
Mike Cladakis
published
3.59
Bert Gierhart
published 4
3.59
Irina Bordyn
published 4
3.43
Tatsiana Beiko
published
3.32
Mark Lazo
published
3.23
Diane Pernell
published 3.5
Greg Yancey
published
Jane Eckhardt
published
Shannon Gallagher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Loesch + Juliann Loesch5452% games+2.3% vs expected
Jane Eckhardt + Mike Cladakis224 matchesnot enough data
Juliann Loesch + Charles Claus134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erik Loesch
74W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Andrew Haefner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Eric Blackstone
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.01
William Estes
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
Juliann Loesch
48W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Corinne Updegrave
104W–74L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Charles Claus
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Debra Mulholland
69W–65L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Mike Cladakis
42W–44L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Bert Gierhart
43W–33L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Irina Bordyn
46W–60L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tatsiana Beiko
29W–92L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
Mark Lazo
22W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Diane Pernell
53W–33L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Greg Yancey
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Eckhardt
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Gallagher
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.