Teams

Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Jared Culbert3-6, 5-7
2026-01-10Won 10
W#3 SinglesLance Court vs Lucas Sun4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-12vs Smith/Rogers/MRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hugen vs Matthew Frail4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJacob Cockrell vs Cory Greenhaw6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Chad Bell6-3, 6-4
2025-02-06vs Smith/Rogers/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicolas Cuadros vs Drew Smith6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hugen vs Matthew Frail7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrian Cosey vs Cory Greenhaw6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-08vs Divakaruni/Bentonville/KTCLost 03
L#1 SinglesBurke Estes vs Tejeshwar PArmar2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesVictor Contreras vs Shashikanth Divakaruni1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Cosey vs Sindhoor Velaga1-6, 0-6
2024-12-11vs Little/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesBurke Estes vs MICHAEL KLEYDMAN2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLance Court vs Carlos Silva1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Deric Neal6-1, 7-6
2024-11-20vs Patterson/Bentonville/MRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Pablo Ivan Lara Zepeda7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBurke Estes vs Frederick Hudspeth6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNicolas Cuadros vs Alvin Hicks6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lance Court
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Joseph Jenson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Jacob Cockrell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Brian Cosey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Burke Estes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.69
Victor Contreras
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Hugen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Nicolas Cuadros
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lance Court
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Joseph Jenson
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jacob Cockrell
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brian Cosey
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Burke Estes
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victor Contreras
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Matthew Hugen
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicolas Cuadros
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.