Teams

Pinellas - McMullen/King

2021 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-20vs McMullen KennerlyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Bensinger / Thor Moody vs Randy Sterns / Rick Tyrrell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCRAIG KEILBACH / Mark Wolfson vs Jim Kennerly / Dennis Weil1-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs YMCA SvensonWon 20
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / William Christensen vs Felix Herrera / Walter Moran6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThor Moody / Roger Bensinger vs Paul Doucette / Mony Rodon6-2, 6-0
2021-02-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarin Garner / CRAIG KEILBACH vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-02-27vs RCSP KimmLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarin Garner / Michael Kosloske vs Michael Kimm / John McQuillen5-7, 3-6
2021-02-17vs McMullen KennerlyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Ehrenpreis / Dane Houston vs Stephen Mullis / Terry Reeb6-4, 6-3
2021-02-06vs YMCA SvensonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Darin Garner vs James Boone / Mony Rodon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Michael Kosloske vs Andy Svenson / William Hunter6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Wolfson / CRAIG KEILBACH vs Felix Herrera / Walter Moran4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-01-23vs RCSP KimmLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Wolfson / Steven Ehrenpreis vs Michael Kimm / John McQuillen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-01-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Steven Ehrenpreis vs Bill Bond / Jack Davis6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.72
Thor Moody
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Martin Revello
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Mark Wolfson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Kosloske
published
William Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + Darin Garner213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wolfson + Thor Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 6 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Kosloske
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Christensen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.