Teams

Bako - Team Holliday

2024 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 4.0 - Bake

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-16vs LLW - Bako - Team AmesLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Amason / Rhonda Slegers vs Briana Starr / Lauren Eittreim4-6, 4-6
2024-06-02vs Bako - Team SeneaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRhonda Slegers vs Linh Bui5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinette Holliday / Edyta Grant vs Samantha Pankey / Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Bako - Team SeneaWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatalie Chene / Linette Holliday vs Gioconda Erquiaga / Cara Williams6-3, 6-4
2024-04-28vs LLW - Bako - Team AmesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinette Holliday / Amy Meger vs Andrea Ames / Hyejung Oh5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Chene / Rhonda Slegers vs Liza Chen / Beth van Voorhis3-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs Bako - Team SeneaLost 01
L#1 SinglesRhonda Slegers vs Linh Bui6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-01vs Bako - Team SeneaLost 01
L#1 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Linh Bui6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Natalie Chene
published
3.44
Marites Idica
published
3.42
Amy Meger
published 4
3.41
Brooke Drake
published 4
3.36
Edyta Grant
published
3.34
Rhonda Slegers
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Amason
published
3.23
Linette Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Badgett
published
Ronel Rabe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Slegers + Linette Holliday5350% gamesnot enough data
Edyta Grant + Natalie Chene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Chene
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Marites Idica
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Amy Meger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Edyta Grant
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Rhonda Slegers
54W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Laura Amason
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Ronel Rabe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.