Teams

Alachua - DB/Bartos

2021 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-12-11vs JTC - CribbWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Ligman / Michael Pu vs David Porter / Andrew Messenger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-12-03vs JTC - KumarLost 01
L#2 DoublesVincent LoCascio / Nash Dean vs Ross van Boven / Christian Newman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFrazier Springfield / Eric Ligman vs Robert Lindgren / David Hou4-6, 4-6
2021-11-14vs WS - PaulyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonald Blair / Newell Fox vs Daniel Jaindl / Alejandro Pauly6-2, 6-2
2021-11-07vs JTC - CribbWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Ligman / Newell Fox vs Sorin Fratila / Ross Davis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesFrazier Springfield / Eric Ligman vs Vincent LoCascio / William Hawkes6-4, 6-0
2021-10-31vs JTC - KumarLost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Ligman / Kejin Dong vs Carlos Manzanas Lopez / Ross van Boven1-6, 5-7
2021-10-30vs JTC - KumarWon 10
W#3 DoublesVincent LoCascio / Nash Dean vs Ashok Kumar / Josh Roberts6-1, 6-2
2021-10-23vs WS - PaulySplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Ligman / Eric Esterline vs David Hou / Volker Mai6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVincent LoCascio / Nash Dean vs Christopher Champion / Corey Sobers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-17vs JTC - KumarWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Edwards / Eric Ligman vs David Hou / Ross van Boven2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-16vs JTC - CribbWon 20
W#2 DoublesEric Ligman / Eric Esterline vs Benjamin Brandt / Roy Cribb6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDouglas Dace / Nash Dean vs John Walt Boatright / Erik Schmidt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Feussner / Newell Fox vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Brad Feussner
published 4.5
4.25
Eric Esterline
published 4.5
Donald Blair
published 4.5
Eric Ligman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.15
Michael Pu
published
3.81
Newell Fox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Nash Dean
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.49
Brett Bartos
published 4
Vincent LoCascio
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Feussner
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Donald Blair
no matches on record · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Eric Ligman
65W–51L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Pu
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.15
Newell Fox
55W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Nash Dean
54W–33L career · 11 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Brett Bartos
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
3.49
Vincent LoCascio
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.