Teams

EM RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-28vs CACM REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / Paul Barben vs John Feldman / Paul Jaszewski3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Jason Schrode3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHayes Trotter / Thomas Toth vs Craig Stromberg / Scott Bice2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGregory Fritsch vs Hervey Pierre3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / David May vs Brian Wylie / Brian Berglund4-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs SKY REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGregory Fritsch / Joe Mahoney vs Bob Sullivan / Greg Rogers4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Gary Williams2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Ekedahl / John Esbenshade vs Kendrick McLish / Jeremy Thomas7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / Hayes Trotter vs Conn Flanigan / Rockwell Pearson6-3, 6-3
2025-05-25vs GAC REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesThomas Toth / Joe Mahoney vs Mark Nothaft / Shawn Harrison7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Stephen Parmentier6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid May / Gregory Fritsch vs Patrick Reed / Martin Rankin1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPaul Barben vs Brandon Paxton6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / Hayes Trotter vs Michael Runda / Gabriel Damico0-6, 0-6
2025-05-21vs DTC REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / David Ekedahl vs William Nelson / Terry Wong7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Morris Askenazi7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid May / Gregory Fritsch vs David Turner / Paul Suter6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHayes Trotter vs Kent Shimek2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Lamar / Daniel Moe vs David Fawley / Jeff Barton7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-07vs CACM GREYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Ekedahl / Gregory Fritsch vs Erik Graver / Michael Nobles6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHayes Trotter / Daniel Moe vs Jason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Barben vs Alex Gurevich6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Lamar / David May vs Ali Barghelame / Jimmie Rose4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-23vs WP-G BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / Gregory Fritsch vs John Wharton / Benjamin Smith3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Ethan Todd2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Toth / John Esbenshade vs Austin Fahsl / Vikrama Chandrashekar6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesPaul Barben vs Stephen Rozman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Lamar / Daniel Moe vs Vincent Vuong / Ethan Butler6-4, 6-2
2025-04-16vs GTC BLACKLost 05
L#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / John Esbenshade vs David Baker / Suresh Gevaran4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Justin Groenewold0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Ekedahl / Thomas Toth vs Roger Montoya / Ben Taylor6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDaniel Moe vs Cole Egger2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid May / Eric Lamar vs Joshua Rozman / Bruce Silver4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Thomas Toth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
David Ekedahl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Eric Lamar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Joe Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Daniel Moe
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.70
John Esbenshade
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Gregory Fritsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Paul Barben
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.50
William Paulling
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Hayes Trotter
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ekedahl + Thomas Toth3357% games+3.5% vs expected
David Ekedahl + John Esbenshade2452% games+2.3% vs expected
Gregory Fritsch + Hayes Trotter2338% games−3.4% vs expected
Daniel Moe + Hayes Trotter2336% games−12.9% vs expected
Gregory Fritsch + Joe Mahoney1446% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Fritsch + John Esbenshade224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Moe + David Ekedahl213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Moe + William Paulling213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Toth
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
David Ekedahl
80W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Eric Lamar
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Joe Mahoney
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Daniel Moe
14W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
John Esbenshade
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Gregory Fritsch
14W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Paul Barben
10W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
William Paulling
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Hayes Trotter
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.