Teams

Ross - RS Hard

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-17vs Boucher - PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Bucco / Danielle Turner vs Amber Culpepper / Sara Boucher6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Slobodian / Susan Schellin vs Laura Bastoni / Madyson Stacker6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Way / Arlene Bronola vs Cindy Myer / Jennifer Stephens4-6, 3-6
2024-11-21vs Escambia/Sparks/18&Over5.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesFernanda Zamorano Rozas / Heysi Mcmillon vs Amatul Bean / Kiley Leonard1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Slobodian / Danielle Turner vs Susan Harberson / Jill Sparks7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Ross / Arlene Bronola vs Jacqueline Pommerening / Reghan Robinson0-6, 2-6
2024-10-24vs Boucher - PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNikki Bucco / Danielle Turner vs Cindy Myer / Jennifer Stephens6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeysi Mcmillon / Fernanda Zamorano Rozas vs Victoria Grise / Laura Bastoni6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Way / Susan Schellin vs Anna Catherine Soule / Madyson Stacker6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Danielle Turner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kathy Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Heysi Mcmillon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Fernanda Zamorano Rozas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alexandra Slobodian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Monika Greene
published
2.57
Susan Schellin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Arlene Bronola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kristy Crowley
published
Nikki Bucco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fernanda Zamorano Rozas + Heysi Mcmillon3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danielle Turner
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kathy Ross
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Heysi Mcmillon
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Fernanda Zamorano Rozas
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Alexandra Slobodian
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monika Greene
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Susan Schellin
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Arlene Bronola
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristy Crowley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Bucco
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.