Teams

LA - Queen V

2021 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-21vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 10
W#3 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Thomas Tucker vs Alexandra Kovach / Krunal Mistry6-0, 6-3
2021-08-14vs LA - MountainGateSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Thomas Tucker vs Betty Shalom / Brandon Joe2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Jay / Becky Leibowitz vs Carlos Yguico / Bettina Poon6-4, 6-4
2021-08-07vs LA - Shadow's AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Thomas Tucker vs Rachel Berk / Simon Lim6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-01vs LA - Ladies and the TrampsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBecky Leibowitz / Michael Jay vs Charmaine Felix-Meyer / Jordan McMahon1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLucien Lacasse / Michelle van Oppen vs Yasaman Barmaki / Theoda Sing6-1, 6-1
2021-07-18vs LA - Team CheviotLost 01
L#1 DoublesLucien Lacasse / Michelle van Oppen vs Annik Bogharian / Hai Vu6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2021-06-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesLucien Lacasse / Michelle van Oppen vs Jamie Owens / Kishore Hiranand6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Thomas Tucker vs Dana Lee / Matthew Hicks6-3, 6-2
2021-06-19vs LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Gloria GellerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBecky Leibowitz / Lucien Lacasse vs Tara Shultz / Jack Burton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Thomas Tucker vs Camille Ellison / Anil Punyapu7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Vilayvanh Shah
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.75
Michelle van Oppen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Becky Leibowitz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Nicole de la Cruz
published
2.90
Fariba Navid
published 3.5
KJ Park
published
Kirk Steinam
published
Michael Jay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vilayvanh Shah + Michelle van Oppen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Vilayvanh Shah
194W–89L career · 7 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Michelle van Oppen
63W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Becky Leibowitz
40W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.54
Nicole de la Cruz
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
2.91
3.5
Fariba Navid
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
2.90
KJ Park
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kirk Steinam
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Jay
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.