Teams

PEAK-Stark

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 3.5 MEN Spokane

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-31vs WCCP-WillmanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAndrew Anderson / David Roth vs Charles McElligott / Steve Lamberson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTanner Tweed vs Sean Lumsden6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Teets / Kevin Kavanaugh vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Bruno Caprez3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesEric Seaman vs Patrick McNulty6-1, 6-4
2023-03-03vs WCCP-OverservedWon 41
L#1 DoublesJeremy Montang / Blaize Bullen vs Benjamin Gozart / Bill Schoultz3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesEric Seaman vs Christopher Thomasson6-3
W#2 DoublesDusty Johnson / Tim Kast vs Jerry Henderson / Pat Nevin6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMark Porcher vs Jordan Stanley6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Roth / John Teets vs John Bumgarner / Clinton Marvel7-5, 7-5
2023-02-17vs NP-Tennis at NPWon 41
W#1 DoublesDusty Johnson / Tim Kast vs Jon Heimbigner / Joshua Cantu6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTanner Tweed vs Sri Purohith6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Teets / David Roth vs Rob Johnson / Bryan Osborn5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEric Seaman vs Jeff Huber6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Porcher / Kevin Kavanaugh vs Doug Bost / Shawn Woodard6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-11vs WCCP-WillmanLost 23
W#1 DoublesTim Kast / Dusty Johnson vs Ray Willman / John Omlin6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTanner Tweed vs Sean Lumsden4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Seaman / Mark Porcher vs Steve Lamberson / Jeffrey Gillespie5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCharles Stark vs Charles McElligott5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Montang / Blaize Bullen vs Robert Vancott / Andre LaSalle0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-03vs NP-Tennis at NPWon 50
W#1 DoublesEric Seaman / Mark Porcher vs Rob Johnson / Bryan Osborn6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTanner Tweed vs Joshua Cantu6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Kast / Dusty Johnson vs Shawn Woodard / Mario Piergallini6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCharles Stark vs Jon Heimbigner6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Teets / David Roth vs Steve Kuka / Doug Bost7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-01-21vs WCCP-OverservedLost 23
L#1 DoublesMark Porcher / John Teets vs Jerry Henderson / Zane Schafer4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCharles Stark vs Zachary Ferriell7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTim Kast / Dusty Johnson vs Benjamin Gozart / Bill Schoultz3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTanner Tweed vs Christopher Thomasson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEric Seaman / Kevin Kavanaugh vs Kevin Collins / Pat Nevin6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 MEN Spokane
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PEAK-Stark42201025238
2WCCP-Overserved42151533287
3NP-Tennis at NP33131740308
4WCCP-Willman15121841296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Dusty Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Andrew Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Charles Stark
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
David Roth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Tim Kast
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Kevin Kavanaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Jeremy Montang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Eric Seaman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
John Teets
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Porcher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tanner Tweed
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dusty Johnson + Tim Kast17860% games+8.9% vs expected
David Roth + Andrew Anderson3352% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Kavanaugh + John Teets044 matchesnot enough data
Mark Porcher + Eric Seaman314 matchesnot enough data
David Roth + John Teets213 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Kavanaugh + Eric Seaman123 matchesnot enough data
John Teets + Mark Porcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dusty Johnson
19W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Anderson
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Charles Stark
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Roth
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Kast
20W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Kevin Kavanaugh
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Jeremy Montang
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.89
Eric Seaman
46W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Teets
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Porcher
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanner Tweed
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.