Teams

Bardmoor Pawlowski

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-04vs Pinellas - McMullen 40-LuvLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Miller / Irene Nasworthy vs Joy Evans / Anne-Lucie Bouchard4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-14vs ELW SanchezWon 10
W#1 SinglesThuy Duong vs Sibila Harja7-5, 6-1
2022-04-30vs Pinellas - McMullen 40-LuvLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarnie Bauer / Thuy Duong vs Lara Slatniske / Kelley Cargle5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesIrene Nasworthy vs Joy Evans1-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs Seminole Lake RhodesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarnie Bauer / Irene Nasworthy vs Diana Zarreke / Debra Hinners7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-16vs Safety Harbor ArmagostWon 20
W#1 SinglesThuy Duong vs Natalia Illich7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrang Duong / Irene Nasworthy vs Kelly Armagost / Cindy Swartz4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-09vs ELW SanchezLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Garlick / Kristine Chunn vs Monica Sanchez / Precious Cabiling4-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs Seminole Lake RhodesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Sandy Martin vs Tiffany Rhodes / Diana Zarreke5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesThuy Duong vs Kathleen Hessinger6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jennifer Garlick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Irene Nasworthy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Marnie Bauer
published
3.71
Cheryl Pawlowski
published 4
3.70
Kristine Chunn
published
3.69
Thuy Duong
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Deirdre West
published 4
3.60
Mary Jacobs
published
3.38
Terry Wilson
published
3.10
Jamie Stein
published 3.5
2.98
Mary Miller
published
Trang Duong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deirdre West + Irene Nasworthy3844% games−13.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Garlick
153W–95L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Marnie Bauer
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Kristine Chunn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Thuy Duong
67W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.69
4
Deirdre West
14W–29L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Mary Jacobs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Terry Wilson
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jamie Stein
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mary Miller
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Trang Duong
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.