Teams

Boren

2026 Lubbock Adult League 40 & Over · 4.0 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-12vs DaneLost 02
L#1 DoublesRanda Wrenn / Jennifer Moore vs Marlowe Malouf Lawson / Ashley Harris0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Kopytkiewicz / Shaunna Jensen vs Beth Sublett / Amy Catlin3-6, 4-6
2026-03-05vs Lott/PalmerLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Boren / Ginger Wayland vs Alisha Evans / Amanda Chisholm3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShaunna Jensen / Angela Trevithick vs Amanda White / Erica Diamond4-6, 3-6
2026-02-25vs Lott/PalmerLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / Randa Wrenn vs Lindsey Craig / Alisha Evans5-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Boren / Jennifer Moore vs Lisa MacK / Maritza Palmer3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKacy Bednarz / Angela Trevithick vs Lynda Pouria / Patty Rogers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs DaneLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaulette Sturdivant / Jennifer Moore vs Paige Dane / Beth Sublett6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Boren / Ginger Wayland vs Sharla Letbetter / Oneal Underwood4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRanda Wrenn / Tiffany Fioroni vs Kristen Strefling / Amy Gandy1-6, 3-6
2026-02-19vs DaneLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaulette Sturdivant / Kathy Dannevik vs Sharla Letbetter / Oneal Underwood2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShaunna Jensen / Tiffany Fioroni vs Elise White / Amy Gandy0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Kopytkiewicz / Kacy Bednarz vs Paige Dane / Sarah Wakefield5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-08vs Lott/PalmerLost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffany Fioroni / Randa Wrenn vs Erica Diamond / Elvira Cruz6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAmy Boren / Angela Trevithick vs Lynda Pouria / Patty Rogers4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Dannevik / Jennifer Moore vs Kimberly Lott / Amanda Chisholm3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Paulette Sturdivant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Randa Wrenn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Amy Boren
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Angela Trevithick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.60
Ginger Wayland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Kathy Dannevik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Tiffany Fioroni
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Laura Kopytkiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Shaunna Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Kacy Bednarz
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Fioroni + Angela Trevithick4253% games+4.9% vs expected
Amy Boren + Angela Trevithick5848% games−1.2% vs expected
Laura Kopytkiewicz + Shaunna Jensen5547% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Fioroni + Shaunna Jensen0535% gamesnot enough data
Shaunna Jensen + Angela Trevithick3265% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Wayland + Tiffany Fioroni033 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Wayland + Angela Trevithick123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Kopytkiewicz + Kacy Bednarz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulette Sturdivant
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Randa Wrenn
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Amy Boren
16W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.68
4
Ginger Wayland
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kathy Dannevik
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Tiffany Fioroni
13W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Laura Kopytkiewicz
23W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Shaunna Jensen
32W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kacy Bednarz
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.