Teams

JMCC/Baird/Beard

2025 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · Womens Day 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-12vs TGC/Pan/KummererWon 32
W#1 DoublesBlakely West / Sonja Brady vs Gigi Dykes / Denise Fulton6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSabrina Campbell vs Irene Kummerer6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSonja Pridgen / Robin Lunsford vs Angie Fowler / Pam Smith3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargie Hull / Lisa Zarb vs Ansley Sanderson / Carolyn Brandwein1-6, 7-6, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJoan Baird / Cathy Gruetter vs Deborah Brown / Diane Southwood6-2, 6-3
2025-02-04vs MCTC/Davis/PeppersWon 32
W#1 DoublesSonja Brady / Blakely West vs Molly Barton / Kimberly Rudolph6-4, 1-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSonja Pridgen vs Katherine Rittenhouse1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargie Hull / Constance Ondo vs Andi Thomas / Elisa Frey-Jackson7-5, 1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesWenqian Kong / Cathy Gruetter vs Angela Davis / Connie Vill6-3, 4-6, 6-1
W#4 DoublesLauren Dorman / Robin Lunsford vs Shanna Addison / Christian Williams6-7, 6-2, 6-3
2025-01-29vs Bishop Park/DavisWon 40
W#1 DoublesSonja Brady / Blakely West vs Jill Haynes / Mindee Grady6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesConstance Ondo / Wenqian Kong vs Monica Matheson / Nancy Harrison6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobin Lunsford / Lauren Dorman vs Tammy Davis / Mary Ellen Vandiver6-1, 6-0
W#4 DoublesSabrina Campbell / Joan Baird vs Karen McCall / Jane Connelly7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens Day 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Sabrina Campbell
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.44
Blakely West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Lauren Dorman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Christine Register
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Margie Hull
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Robin Lunsford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Constance Ondo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Zarb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Wenqian Kong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Cathy Gruetter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Wanda Beard
published
3.00
Kim Jones
published
2.98
Debbie Culpepper
published 3
2.97
Sonja Pridgen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Joan Baird
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Sonja Brady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Angela Harcourt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Nancy Crew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Lunsford + Lauren Dorman7454% games+4.0% vs expected
Debbie Culpepper + Wanda Beard5750% games+2.4% vs expected
Constance Ondo + Margie Hull2741% games−8.1% vs expected
Blakely West + Sabrina Campbell6262% gamesnot enough data
Margie Hull + Lisa Zarb134 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Gruetter + Margie Hull123 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Gruetter + Lauren Dorman213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Gruetter + Joan Baird213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sabrina Campbell
55W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Blakely West
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lauren Dorman
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Christine Register
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Margie Hull
23W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Robin Lunsford
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Constance Ondo
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Lisa Zarb
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Wenqian Kong
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Cathy Gruetter
18W–30L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Wanda Beard
24W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kim Jones
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Debbie Culpepper
11W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Sonja Pridgen
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Joan Baird
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sonja Brady
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Angela Harcourt
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Nancy Crew
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.