Teams

Bernard/18/5.5/CWD/CCLA

2024 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

24 players · average NTRP 2.92 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-04vs Sivils/18/5.5/CWD/BOCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSummer Soileau / Jennifer Mogenson vs Mandy Woodward / Aly Thames6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerre Smith / Stephanie Chenevert vs Marguerite Istre / Niki Hopkins6-1, 7-5
2024-09-27vs Allain/18/5.5/CWD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaylin Percy / Nicole DeMoss vs Sonni Bernhard / Christy Schmoll2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Nicolich / Leah Gaiennie vs Janet Rockforte / Amanda Lewis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrisha Carmouche / Stephanie Chenevert vs Jamie Bolotte / Jessica Ledet1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-20vs Campbell/18/5.5/CWD/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarla Toups / Morgan Nicolich vs Emily Magee / Dawn Rabalais6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcy Bernard / Leah Gaiennie vs Kathleen Holland / Katie Guitreau5-6
W#3 DoublesCandace Mula / Ashley Gravois vs Samantha Blalock / Kennon Campbell6-2, 6-4
2024-09-17vs Allain/18/5.5/CWD/BRECLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrisha Carmouche / Charlotte Smith vs Christy Schmoll / Molly Currie2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Nicolich / Candace Mula vs Ali Enos / Patricia Duvic1-6, 2-6
2024-09-13vs Sivils/18/5.5/CWD/BOCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcy Bernard / Trisha Carmouche vs Amy Craig / Aly Thames4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Baldwin / Stephanie Chenevert vs Carolyn Elofson / Jeanne Davis3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Davis / Michele Percy vs Shannon Morgan / Marguerite Istre2-6, 5-7
2024-08-27vs Campbell/18/5.5/CWD/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarla Toups / Nicole DeMoss vs Kathleen Holland / Caitlin Hebert7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTerri Baldwin / Leah Gaiennie vs Kennon Campbell / Katie Guitreau6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCrystal Donovan / Trisha Carmouche vs Nina Day / Cristina Blanchard6-2, 6-2
2024-08-23vs Sivils/18/5.5/CWD/BOCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerri Baldwin / Jennifer Mogenson vs Kristin Sandefer / Jeanne Davis6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRondi Cowart / Morgan Nicolich vs Amy Craig / Aly Thames1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTerre Smith / Jan Chiles vs Kelli Harton / Marguerite Istre6-4, 6-3
2024-08-09vs Allain/18/5.5/CWD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Mogenson / Summer Soileau vs Ali Enos / Molly Currie6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeredyth Rotolo / Charlotte Smith vs Christy Schmoll / Patricia Duvic2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Gravois / Alexis Freeman vs Tammy Heard / Julie LeBlanc0-6, 2-6
2024-08-02vs Campbell/18/5.5/CWD/SOACLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Chenevert / Stacey Davis vs Nina Day / Katie Guitreau6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeah Gaiennie / Crystal Donovan vs Kathleen Holland / Samantha Blalock2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Percy / Theresa Gomez vs Caitlin Hebert / Dawn Rabalais0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Allain/18/5.5/CWD/BREC9024311111
2Sivils/18/5.5/CWD/BOC45161125226
3Bernard/18/5.5/CWD/CCLA45121530245
4Campbell/18/5.5/CWD/SOAC1822550307

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Julie Talbot
published
3.15
Summer Soileau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Marcy Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Jennifer Mogenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Rondi Cowart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Stephanie Chenevert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Anu Mehrotra
published 3
2.85
Candace Mula
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Terre Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Terri Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Annie Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Crystal Donovan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Jennifer Frederick
published
2.59
Kaylin Percy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Morgan Nicolich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Theresa Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jan Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Nicole DeMoss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Ashley Gravois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Leah Gaiennie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Meredyth Rotolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marla Toups
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michele Percy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trisha Carmouche
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mogenson + Julie Talbot5072% games+15.8% vs expected
Rondi Cowart + Terre Smith6262% games+7.4% vs expected
Jennifer Mogenson + Terre Smith7362% games+4.2% vs expected
Theresa Gomez + Jan Chiles4248% games+2.8% vs expected
Rondi Cowart + Summer Soileau3354% games+1.9% vs expected
Summer Soileau + Jennifer Mogenson5261% games−2.2% vs expected
Jan Chiles + Terre Smith4250% games−3.4% vs expected
Theresa Gomez + Jennifer Mogenson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Talbot
52W–27L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Summer Soileau
65W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marcy Bernard
26W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jennifer Mogenson
69W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Rondi Cowart
51W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Stephanie Chenevert
93W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Anu Mehrotra
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Candace Mula
25W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Terre Smith
46W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Terri Baldwin
30W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Annie Brock
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Crystal Donovan
12W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Frederick
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Kaylin Percy
20W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Morgan Nicolich
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Theresa Gomez
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Jan Chiles
34W–40L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Nicole DeMoss
6W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Ashley Gravois
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Leah Gaiennie
10W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Meredyth Rotolo
2W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Marla Toups
26W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Percy
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trisha Carmouche
9W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.