← Teams

MAC-Wright/Thomas

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jim Lekas
published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Matt Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Claude Bosworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Martin Sommer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Alan Peters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Jim Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
John Nee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Ron Eiseman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Fred Buller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Gary Hallmark
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Results9 ties
2024-12-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAlan Peters / Claude Bosworth vs Bryan Potter / Bryan LaMontagne7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMatt Curtis / Jim Burns vs Stephen Doubleday / Rich Brown6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZachary Wright / Fred Buller vs Eugene Avery / Christopher Thomas6-4, 6-2
2024-11-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Fred Buller vs Charles Stewart / Tim Janes6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Burns / Martin Sommer vs Robert Piercy / Gregory Foster6-4, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Curtis / Ron Eiseman vs Mister Archedon / Ken Bolton6-3, 6-2
2024-11-17Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Gary Hallmark vs Dale Christensen / Doug Christensen6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesClaude Bosworth / Andrew Smith vs Winston Young / Dave Sato7-5, 6-1
2024-11-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesFred Buller / James Thomas vs Mitchell Todd / Philip Mikolaj6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Nee / Andrew Smith vs Manoj Agnihotri / Sheldon Katayama6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartin Sommer / Craig Nichols vs Jonathan Guinn / Dave Hardman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-25Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesClaude Bosworth / Andrew Smith vs David Lomartire / John Brady7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFred Buller / James Thomas vs Jeff Mcdougald / Michael Rich6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJim Burns / Matt Curtis vs David Williams / Jim Mounts6-2, 6-4
2024-10-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Fred Buller vs Robert Hesslink / Paul Preston0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Curtis / Alan Peters vs Michael McTague / Lars Kasch6-3, 7-6
2024-09-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAlan Peters / Gary Hallmark vs Jeff Berg / Kevin Grant6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Thomas / Fred Buller vs Mike Olson / Todd Berinstein6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClaude Bosworth / Ron Eiseman vs Jack Crossen / James Araujo5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-15Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRon Eiseman / Scott Inukai vs Thomas MacDonald / Dave Gillard6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Curtis / Alan Peters vs Kerry Sweet / JAMES KYUNG7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Hallmark / Zachary Wright vs Patrick Priest / Jeff Hilden6-2, 6-3
2024-09-07Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Gary Hallmark vs Paul Garrahan / Joel Naumoff6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Curtis / Ron Eiseman vs Brian Hefele / Anthony Yazzolino6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jim Lekas
22W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Matt Curtis
45W–35L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Claude Bosworth
38W–71L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3.5
Martin Sommer
7W–4L career
69%31%0%
2.84
3
Alan Peters
2W–21L career
not enough data
—
3
Jim Burns
26W–30L career
not enough data
—
3
John Nee
38W–66L career
not enough data
—
3
Ron Eiseman
6W–43L career
not enough data
—
3
Fred Buller
22W–18L career
10%88%2%
2.70
2.5
Gary Hallmark
9W–18L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.